We Help Real People With Real Problems

512-200-4529 Call Us Today

Key Considerations in Contested Child Custody Cases

Contested cases of custody (referred to in Texas law as conservatorship) generally arise when parents cannot agree on where their children should live and who will make major decisions about their lives. Judges are always guided by the central concept of the “best interests of the child.” This standard, however, provides broad room for legal argument and disagreements. Here is a brief overview from a child custody lawyer serving Austin, TX, of the key considerations in contested child custody cases.

Key Considerations in Contested Child Custody Cases: Tips from a Child Custody Lawyer in Austin, TX

The Child’s Wishes

While courts don’t simply abide by what the child says they want, the child’s preferences carry weight. The level of influence the child’s desires have depends heavily on their age and maturity. Judges may directly interview older children to gauge their preferences or seek input from a custody evaluator regarding the child’s wishes. It’s important to note that courts won’t automatically grant a teen’s desire to live with one parent over another, but their views are factored into the decision.

Each Parent’s Ability to Provide a Suitable Home

The court carefully assesses both parents’ ability to provide a safe, adequate, and nurturing home environment. A key factor that is considered is stability: whether the parent has a stable living situation and income. The support system of each parent is another major consideration. Are there other responsible adults (grandparents, new partners, etc) in a position to help with childcare and household needs? The court will also consider whether the parent’s lifestyle demonstrates a consistent pattern of responsibility and decision-making that prioritizes the child’s well-being.
Environment and location are also taken into account, and the court will assess whether a home is safe, clean, and appropriately sized for the child and if the child has a private space of their own. The court decision may also be affected by the safety of the neighborhood, as well as the quality of education offered by the local school district. Your Austin, TX child custody lawyer can help you make the best possible case for showing your home as the best place for your child.

The Parent-Child Bond

A strong parent-child bond is crucial to a child’s wellbeing. Courts evaluate the nature of the relationship each parent has with the child and consider who acted traditionally as the primary caregiver during the child’s life. Any history of neglect or indifference will severely harm a parent’s case, of course, but also judges will carefully examine the parent’s responsiveness to the child’s needs, their level of active engagement (playing, reading, attending activities), and the emotional warmth between the parent and child.
Judges, however, are also keen to facilitate a healthy relationship between the child and both parents if it’s safe and in the child’s best interests. A parent who historically has been less involved may still argue for substantial parenting time if they demonstrate a genuine desire to strengthen their bond with the child. The court may look favorably on a parent taking positive steps such as attending parenting classes, seeking therapy to address past issues, or consistently demonstrating a commitment to building a healthy relationship with the child.

Mental and Physical Health of the Parents

A parent’s ability to manage their own mental and physical well-being impacts their capacity to care for a child. Courts will look over any history of diagnosed mental illness, especially if it is uncontrolled and untreated. Issues like severe depression, substance abuse, or personality disorders can undermine a parent’s ability to provide a stable and nurturing environment. Chronic physical illnesses or disabilities might be considered, but only if they demonstrably and significantly interfere with a parent’s ability to care for their child.

It’s important to note that courts should not discriminate based on health conditions alone. A history of mental illness, for instance, doesn’t automatically exclude a parent from custody if they can demonstrate the condition is well-managed.

Evidence of Abuse or Neglect

Credible evidence of child abuse or neglect is one of the most critical factors in custody decisions. Courts take the protection of children extremely seriously. If one parent has a credible history of physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, or neglect, their custodial rights may be severely restricted or even eliminated.

Physical abuse involves any form of violence that causes or threatens physical harm to the child. Emotional abuse consists of repeated patterns of belittling, shaming, or isolating the child, all of which cause significant harm to their emotional development. Sexual abuse refers to any sexual contact or exploitation of the child. Neglect means a failure to provide for the child’s basic needs, such as food, shelter, safety, clothing, or medical care.

Domestic Violence as a Factor

History of domestic violence between the parents (even in the absence of direct child abuse) can weigh heavily against an abuser trying to obtain custody rights. Courts are aware that children who witness domestic violence suffer emotional harm, which often then leads to behavioral difficulties or developmental issues.
The court may limit an abusive parent’s contact with the child and might require supervised visitation to ensure the child’s safety. In cases of severe or ongoing abuse, the court may determine that it is not in the child’s best interests to have any contact with the abusive parent.

Cooperation and Communication Between Parents

While contested custody cases often involve conflicted parents, the court strongly values the ability of parents to put their differences aside and communicate effectively for the child’s sake. Judges look favorably upon parents who can share information about the child’s school, medical needs, and activities, make joint decisions without undue conflict, and speak respectfully about the other parent in front of the child. 
Conversely, a history of badmouthing the other parent, interfering with visitation, or refusing to cooperate on child-related matters can seriously jeopardize a parent’s chances of obtaining the custody arrangement they seek.

The Role of Attorneys and Expert Witnesses

Contested child custody cases can be complicated both on the legal side and on the personal side, often involving deeply painful information. A skilled family law attorney who understands Texas family law, particularly the law related to custody, will help to explain the relevant standards and how they apply to your case. Your attorney will also help gather the necessary evidence to support your claim for custody or visitation rights, and will assist you in preparing for hearings. They will give advice on how to present yourself favorably in court, as well as how to articulate your arguments in a compelling manner.

Child custody cases may also involve expert witnesses. Expert witnesses are professionals with specialized knowledge in a particular field who provide opinions and analysis to assist the court in making informed decisions. In custody cases, psychologists or custody evaluators might assess family dynamics and provide written reports and recommendations to the court based on interviews and testing. Child specialists may interview the child and testify about their well-being and preferences. Additionally, medical professionals might evaluate the physical or mental health of a parent or child when those factors are significant to the case.

If you are facing a custody dispute, contact us at the Eggleston Law Firm, PC. Our experienced family law attorneys are dedicated to providing compassionate guidance and walking with you through this difficult process.

The information provided should not be taken as legal advice. For the most current and thorough details, it is advisable to seek assistance from a legal professional by contacting a qualified attorney.